Abstract
This paper traces the impact of three knowledge management (KM) projects inside a global pharmaceuticals firm. The first was a conventional debriefing exercise; the second a major investment in an electronic repository, 'Warehouse'; and the third, 'Café', an attempt to use web technology to construct new 'communities of practice'. Discussions of KM have been dominated by prescriptive and managerialist approaches that ignore organisational politics and the impact of KM on the labour process. We place these issues at the centre of our account of KM. The critical weaknesses of the KM projects were: first, their reliance on the active involvement of labour. Passive resistance was sufficient to limit the impact of KM in practice. Second, the technical development of KM systems was not matched by the formation of consistent, centralised measures of social processes. Both factors severely limited the development of KM as a durable power/knowledge regime.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2002). The limits of knowledge management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 17(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00095
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.