The limits of knowledge management

76Citations
Citations of this article
93Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

This paper traces the impact of three knowledge management (KM) projects inside a global pharmaceuticals firm. The first was a conventional debriefing exercise; the second a major investment in an electronic repository, 'Warehouse'; and the third, 'Café', an attempt to use web technology to construct new 'communities of practice'. Discussions of KM have been dominated by prescriptive and managerialist approaches that ignore organisational politics and the impact of KM on the labour process. We place these issues at the centre of our account of KM. The critical weaknesses of the KM projects were: first, their reliance on the active involvement of labour. Passive resistance was sufficient to limit the impact of KM in practice. Second, the technical development of KM systems was not matched by the formation of consistent, centralised measures of social processes. Both factors severely limited the development of KM as a durable power/knowledge regime.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Currie, G., & Procter, S. (2002). The limits of knowledge management. New Technology, Work and Employment, 17(2), 76–88. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-005X.00095

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free