Paul's common paraenesis (1 Thess. 4-5; Phil. 2-4; and Rom. 12-13): The correspondence between Romans 1:18-32 and 12:1-2, and the Unity of Romans 12-13

4Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

First Thessalonians 5:12-24; Romans 12:9-21; and Philippians 4:2-9 show close parallels, while their wider contexts (1 Thess. 4-5; Rom. 12-13; and Phil. 3:17-4:9) also display a substantial parallelism. This observation leads us to affirm Paul's common paraenesis (cf. 1 Cor. 4:17), and helps us see what he considers the fundamental way of Christian existence (cf. Gal. 5:22-25). Then, this observation helps us also see (a) the correspondence between Romans 1:18-32 and 12:1-2; (b) the unity of Romans 12-13 as a whole, in which Romans 12:1-2 and 13:11-14 form an inclusio, which are, respectively, the thesis statement and the concluding statement about the Daseinsweise of the redeemed in contrast to that of fallen humanity in Romans 1:18-21; and (c) the consistent line of Paul's thinking in Romans, which is sustained through his Adam-Christ antithesis (5:12-21). Finally, the notion of Paul's common paraenesis enables us to conduct a comparative study of the paraenetical sections of the various epistles of Paul and to appreciate the distinctive elements in a given epistle (e.g. the extended elaboration of the theme of 'living peaceably with all' in Rom. 12:14-13:10) in terms of the particular needs of the recipients of that epistle.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Kim, S. (2011). Paul’s common paraenesis (1 Thess. 4-5; Phil. 2-4; and Rom. 12-13): The correspondence between Romans 1:18-32 and 12:1-2, and the Unity of Romans 12-13. Tyndale Bulletin, 62(1), 109–139. https://doi.org/10.53751/001c.29310

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free