GeLC-Orbitrap/MS and 2-DE-MALDI-TOF/TOF comparative proteomics analysis of seed cotyledons from the non-orthodox Quercus ilex tree species

15Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Gel electrophoresis-based and shotgun approaches are the most employed proteomic platforms in plant biology research, with the latter replacing the former in the last years. We have compared 2-DE-MALDI-TOF/TOF and GeLC-Orbitrap/MS analyses using the same protein extracts from Quercus ilex cotyledons at different development stages. The results obtained (ProteomeXchange available data, PXD020603) showed that both platforms were complementary, showing common and specific proteins identified in each case, but leading to similar biological conclusions. Protein analysis identified 562 spots in gel-based (292 variables) and 2409 proteins in shotgun (560 variables), that were detected with both platforms and represent common key pathways related to maturation and germination. The main differences concern hormone metabolism, storage and late embryogenesis abundant proteins. Deeper proteome coverage was obtained with the shotgun approach, with a greater number of metabolic pathways represented, as gibberellin biosynthesis, not observed in the gel-based analysis. Nevertheless, several storage proteins, highly abundant in cotyledons and well represented in gel-based platform were not identified using the shotgun platform. These results support that when analyzing any plant biological process, the use of both platforms is complementary rather than redundant, that favors an in-depth proteomic analysis and a more confident biological interpretation of the data obtained.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sghaier-Hammami, B., Castillejo, M. Á., Baazaoui, N., Jorrín-Novo, J. V., & Escandón, M. (2021). GeLC-Orbitrap/MS and 2-DE-MALDI-TOF/TOF comparative proteomics analysis of seed cotyledons from the non-orthodox Quercus ilex tree species. Journal of Proteomics, 233. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jprot.2020.104087

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free