Penegakan Hukum atas Kewenangan Majelis Pengawas Wilayah Notaris Yang Memberikan Teguran Tertulis Kepada Notaris” (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 190/G/2020/PTUN.JKT)

Abstract

Law enforcement carried out by the Supervisory Council of the DKI Jakarta Province Notary Region is an administrative law enforcement because the sanctions given to a Notary are only in the form of a written warning as stated in Decision Number: 05/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKI Jakarta/IX/2020, dated September 14, 2020. Meanwhile, law enforcement carried out by a Notary who feels aggrieved by the written warning is to file a lawsuit to the State Administrative Court in Register Number: 190/G/2020/PTUN-JKT which was won by the Notary as the Plaintiff. The authority of the Supervisory Council of the Notary Region of DKI Jakarta Province which was obtained based on the authority of the delegation from the Minister of Law and Human Rights who had given a sanction to a Notary in the form of a written warning as stated in Decision Number: 05/PTS/Mj.PWN.Prov.DKI Jakarta/IX/2020, dated September 14, 2020 is a product of State Administration which is a the object of the State Administrative Court in accordance with Article 53 paragraph (2) of the Administrative Court Law. This study suggests that state administration officials should pay attention to the general principles of good governance. In particular, the principle of acting carefully and playing a proper game so that the decision given does not violate the provisions of the applicable laws and regulations.