Acute and 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of the ACS duet stent for single-vessel coronary artery disease: Final results of the European and U.S. ACS Multi-Link Duet Registry

5Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The aim of the study was to determine the safety and efficacy of the second-generation ACS Multi-Link Duet coronary stent system for the treatment of single, symptomatic, de novo, native coronary artery lesions. Between February and June 1998, 427 patients (69.3% male, 51.5% class 3 or 4 angina, 20.1% diabetic, 43.6% hyperlipidemia) were included at 38 centers in this prospective observational study. All patients received ticlopidine 500 mg/day for 1 month and aspirin ≥100 mg/day. The Duet stent was available in 8, 18, and 28 mm length and 3.0, 3.5, and 4.0 mm diameter. After adequate predilatation, stents were successfully implanted, at up to 16 atm, in 99.3% of patients. Mean vessel diameter by core laboratory quantitative coronary angiography was 3.0 ± 0.53 mm and postprocedural minimum luminal diameter was 2.79 ± 0.43 mm (12% ± 9.3% diameter stenosis). At 30 days, 96.7% of patients were event-free and at 6 months 88.1% remained free of major adverse cardiac events. The restenosis rate was 18.1%. The ACS Duet stent was safely implanted in >99% of target lesions by a diverse group of international investigators. With late outcomes at least comparable to the best published results, this stent platform provides safe and effective percutaneous treatment of obstructive coronary artery disease. © 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Foley, D. P., Kererakes, D., Te Riele, J. A. M., Nishimura, N., Veldhof, S., Fink, S., … Serruys, P. W. (2001). Acute and 6-month clinical and angiographic outcome after implantation of the ACS duet stent for single-vessel coronary artery disease: Final results of the European and U.S. ACS Multi-Link Duet Registry. Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions, 54(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.1002/ccd.1233

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free