Alternative retirement income strategies: A cohort analysis of lifetime redistribution

9Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

This paper compares the lifetime redistribution and progressivity, within a cohort of males, of two retirement income systems. The current government strategy in Australia is to increase the role of occupational superannuation and maintain a means-tested age pension. The Institute of Actuaries of Australia has recommended a universal pension with a corresponding smaller role for occupational superannuation. In terms of lifetime inequality and progressivity measures, it is found that there is not a substantial difference between the two systems. Other issues, such as the benefit choice at retirement and differential mortality, are found to be more important in determining the lifetime redistributive impact of a retirement income strategy.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Atkinson, M. E., Greedy, J., & Knox, D. M. (1996). Alternative retirement income strategies: A cohort analysis of lifetime redistribution. Economic Record, 72(217), 97–106. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-4932.1996.tb00944.x

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free