Abstract
Objective: Endovascular therapy of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes in women vs men. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown similarly favorable outcomes in men and women in calcified coronary arteries, there is no published safety and effectiveness data of peripheral IVL differentiated by sex. This study aims to evaluate sex-specific acute procedural safety and effectiveness following IVL treatment of calcified PAD. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the multicenter Disrupt PAD III Observational Study, which assessed short-term procedural outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of symptomatic calcified lower extremity PAD with the Shockwave peripheral IVL system. Adjudicated acute safety and efficacy outcomes were compared by sex using univariate analysis performed with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Results: A total of 1262 patients (29.9% women) were included, with >85% having moderate to severe lesion calcification. Women were older (74 vs 71 years; P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Nagpal, S., Altin, S. E., McGinigle, K., Mangalmurti, S. S., Adams, G., Shammas, N. W., … Lansky, A. J. (2024). Sex-specific analysis of intravascular lithotripsy for peripheral artery disease from the Disrupt PAD III observational study. In Journal of Vascular Surgery (Vol. 79, pp. 358–365). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.058
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.