Sex-specific analysis of intravascular lithotripsy for peripheral artery disease from the Disrupt PAD III observational study

2Citations
Citations of this article
14Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Objective: Endovascular therapy of lower extremity peripheral artery disease (PAD) is associated with higher complication rates and worse outcomes in women vs men. Although intravascular lithotripsy (IVL) has shown similarly favorable outcomes in men and women in calcified coronary arteries, there is no published safety and effectiveness data of peripheral IVL differentiated by sex. This study aims to evaluate sex-specific acute procedural safety and effectiveness following IVL treatment of calcified PAD. Methods: We performed a secondary analysis of the multicenter Disrupt PAD III Observational Study, which assessed short-term procedural outcomes of patients undergoing treatment of symptomatic calcified lower extremity PAD with the Shockwave peripheral IVL system. Adjudicated acute safety and efficacy outcomes were compared by sex using univariate analysis performed with the χ2 test or Fisher exact test, as appropriate. Results: A total of 1262 patients (29.9% women) were included, with >85% having moderate to severe lesion calcification. Women were older (74 vs 71 years; P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Nagpal, S., Altin, S. E., McGinigle, K., Mangalmurti, S. S., Adams, G., Shammas, N. W., … Lansky, A. J. (2024). Sex-specific analysis of intravascular lithotripsy for peripheral artery disease from the Disrupt PAD III observational study. In Journal of Vascular Surgery (Vol. 79, pp. 358–365). Elsevier Inc. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jvs.2023.10.058

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free