An ultrasound needle insertion guide in a porcine phantom model

21Citations
Citations of this article
41Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

We compared nerve blockade with and without the Infiniti™ needle guide in an ultrasound in-plane porcine simulation. We recruited 30 anaesthetists with varying blockade experience. Using the guide, the needle tip was more visible (for a median (IQR [range]) of 67 (56-100]) % of the time; and invisible for 2 (1-4 [0-19]) s) than when the guide was not used (respectively 23 (13-43 [0-80]) % and 25 (9-52 [1-198]) s; both p < 0.001). The corresponding block times were 8 (6-10 [3-28]) s and 32 (15-67 [5-225]) s, respectively; p < 0.001. The needle guide reduced the block time and the time that the needle was invisible, irrespective of anaesthetist experience. © 2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Whittaker, S., Lethbridge, G., Kim, C., Keon Cohen, Z., & Ng, I. (2013). An ultrasound needle insertion guide in a porcine phantom model. Anaesthesia, 68(8), 826–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12262

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free