Abstract
We compared nerve blockade with and without the Infiniti™ needle guide in an ultrasound in-plane porcine simulation. We recruited 30 anaesthetists with varying blockade experience. Using the guide, the needle tip was more visible (for a median (IQR [range]) of 67 (56-100]) % of the time; and invisible for 2 (1-4 [0-19]) s) than when the guide was not used (respectively 23 (13-43 [0-80]) % and 25 (9-52 [1-198]) s; both p < 0.001). The corresponding block times were 8 (6-10 [3-28]) s and 32 (15-67 [5-225]) s, respectively; p < 0.001. The needle guide reduced the block time and the time that the needle was invisible, irrespective of anaesthetist experience. © 2013 The Association of Anaesthetists of Great Britain and Ireland.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Whittaker, S., Lethbridge, G., Kim, C., Keon Cohen, Z., & Ng, I. (2013). An ultrasound needle insertion guide in a porcine phantom model. Anaesthesia, 68(8), 826–829. https://doi.org/10.1111/anae.12262
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.