Comparing inhaled ultrafine versus fine zinc oxide particles in healthy adults: A human inhalation study

155Citations
Citations of this article
89Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Rationale: Zinc oxide is a common, biologically active constituent of particulate air pollution as well as a workplace toxin. Ultrafine particles (< 0.1 μm diameter) are believed to be more potent than an equal mass of inhaled accumulation mode particles (0.1-1.0 μm diameter). Objectives: We compared exposure-response relationships for respiratory, hematologic, and cardiovascular endpoints between ultrafine and accumulation mode zinc oxide particles. Methods: In a human inhalation study, 12 healthy adults inhaled 500 μg/m3 of ultrafine zinc oxide, the same mass of fine zinc oxide, and filtered air while at rest for 2 hours. Measurements and Main Results: Preexposure and follow-up studies of symptoms, leukocyte surface markers, hemostasis, and cardiac electrophysiology were conducted to 24 hours post-exposure. Induced sputum was sampled 24 hours after exposure. No differences were detected between any of the three exposure conditions at this level of exposure. Conclusions: Freshly generated zinc oxide in the fine or ultrafine fractions inhaled by healthy subjects at rest at a concentration of 500 μg/m3 for 2 hours is below the threshold for acute systemic effects as detected by these endpoints.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beckett, W. S., Chalupa, D. F., Pauly-Brown, A., Speers, D. M., Stewart, J. C., Frampton, M. W., … Oberdörster, G. (2005). Comparing inhaled ultrafine versus fine zinc oxide particles in healthy adults: A human inhalation study. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 171(10), 1129–1135. https://doi.org/10.1164/rccm.200406-837OC

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free