The civil society effect revisited on the politics of liberal philanthropy today

0Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this essay, I reconsider the politics of contemporary philanthropy by navigating between two dominant ideological perspectives on civil society: Depoliticization and demonization. I do so with reference to the recent tribulations of three famous magnate-philanthropists, Osman Kavala, Mikhail Khodorkovsky, and George Soros. By revisiting my concept of the “civil society effect” – the romanticizing of civil society as a domain free from instrumental political motivations – I aim to shed light on the broader political terrain of contemporary capitalism, in which private capital is too easily understood as a neutral medium for political transformations. At the same time, I focus on the histories and genealogies that the depoliticization of civil society silences, especially the imperial legacies that opponents of liberal philosophy – new authoritarians such as Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Vladimir Putin and Viktor Orbán – frequently invoke with pugnacity.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Walton, J. F. (2019). The civil society effect revisited on the politics of liberal philanthropy today. Contradictions, 3(2), 131–137. https://doi.org/10.46957/con.2019.2.7

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free