Lexicographic solutions for coalitional rankings

15Citations
Citations of this article
9Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In many real world situations, the design of social rankings over agents or items from a given raking over groups or coalitions, to which these agents or items belong to, is of big interest. With this aim, we revise the lexicographic excellence solution and introduce two novel solutions which, moreover, take into account the size of the groups. We present some desirable axioms which are interpreted in this context. Next, a comparable axiomatization of these three solutions is established, revealing the main differences among the two new social rankings and the lexicographic excellence solution. Finally, we apply the three social rankings under study to a real scenario. Specifically, the performance of some football players of Paris Saint-Germain during the UEFA Champions League according to these three rules is analyzed.

References Powered by Scopus

The theory of convex geometries

290Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Games with permission structures: The conjunctive approach

170Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

A note on the extension of an order on a set to the power set

124Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Cited by Powered by Scopus

Lexicographic solutions for coalitional rankings based on individual and collective performances

8Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Building rankings encompassing multiple criteria to support qualitative decision-making

5Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Consistent social ranking solutions

4Citations
N/AReaders
Get full text

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Algaba, E., Moretti, S., Rémila, E., & Solal, P. (2021). Lexicographic solutions for coalitional rankings. Social Choice and Welfare, 57(4), 817–849. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00355-021-01340-z

Readers over time

‘21‘22‘2301234

Readers' Seniority

Tooltip

Researcher 2

50%

Professor / Associate Prof. 1

25%

PhD / Post grad / Masters / Doc 1

25%

Readers' Discipline

Tooltip

Economics, Econometrics and Finance 2

67%

Medicine and Dentistry 1

33%

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free
0