Charting the Pacific: An Empirical Assessment of Integration Initiatives

11Citations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

Trade negotiations after Uruguay may well be dominated by the Pacific Rim, where two free trade areas (ASEAN Free Trade Agreement, orAFTA; and North American Free Trade Agreement, or NAFTA) already exist and larger agreements are under active discussion (involving the Asia Pacific Economic Cooperation, orAPEC, area and an East Asian Economic Group). This article analyzes several initiatives using a simple global general equilibrium model that incorporates conventional welfare gains as well as benefits derived from firm level economies of scale, induced changes in foreign investment, and dynamic increases in productivity. Broad Pacific liberalization—i.e., East Asia, North America, and Australasia—is shown to be superior for each participant to liberalization limited to individual countries or East Asia, but not by much. Most favored nation liberalization is shown to be superior for each participant to preferential liberalization—if the actor is East Asia, but not the Pacific as a whole. These estimates will need to be refined, but they suggest that the benefits from Pacific liberalization could exceed $100 billion per year. © Taylor & Francis Group, LLC.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Martin, W., Petri, P. A., & Yanagishima, K. (1994). Charting the Pacific: An Empirical Assessment of Integration Initiatives. International Trade Journal, 8(4), 447–482. https://doi.org/10.1080/08853909408523813

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free