Current limitations and perspectives in single port surgery: Pros and cons Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for renal surgery

17Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Laparo-Endoscopic Single-Site surgery (LESS) for kidney diseases is quickly evolving and has a tendency to expand the urological armory of surgical techniques. However, we should not be overwhelmed by the surgical skills only and weight it against the basic clinical and oncological principles when compared to standard laparoscopy. The initial goal is to define the ideal candidates and ideal centers for LESS in the future. Modification of basic instruments in laparoscopy presumably cannot result in better functional and oncological outcomes, especially when the optimal working space is limited with the same arm movements. Single port surgery is considered minimally invasive laparoscopy; on the other hand, when using additional ports, it is no more single port, but hybrid traditional laparoscopy. Whether LESS is a superior or equally technique compared to traditional laparoscopy has to be proven by future prospective randomized trials. Copyright © 2010 PeterWeibl et al.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Weibl, P., Klingler, H. C., Klatte, T., & Remzi, M. (2010). Current limitations and perspectives in single port surgery: Pros and cons Laparo-endoscopic single-site surgery (LESS) for renal surgery. Diagnostic and Therapeutic Endoscopy. https://doi.org/10.1155/2010/759431

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free