In-database query optimization on SQL with ML predicates

6Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Extended SQL with machine learning (ML) predicates, commonly referred to as SQL+ML, integrates ML abilities into traditional SQL processing in databases. When processing SQL+ML queries, some methods move data from database (DB) systems to ML systems to support SQL+ML queries. Such methods are not only costly due to maintaining two copies of data, but also pose security risks due to data movement. Fortunately, in-database SQL+ML processing addresses these limitations. However, conventional DB optimizers take ML predicates as UDFs (user-defined functions) and cannot optimize them using query rewriter and cost models. To boost the efficiency of in-database SQL+ML processing, this paper proposes to generate SQL predicates based on ML predicates and add them into SQL+ML queries, which can prune a significant number of irrelevant tuples and thus improve the performance. Optimizing SQL+ML queries presents three challenges: (C1) how to generate valid SQL predicates, (C2) how to select high-quality SQL predicates, and (C3) how to optimize the query using SQL predicates. To address these challenges, we propose Smart, which integrates three novel modules into the database optimizer: (1) inference rewrite: generating tight and valid SQL predicates for logical optimization; (2) progressive inference: selecting high-pruning-power but low-overhead SQL predicates to prune irrelevant tuples; (3) cost-optimal inference: optimizing the cost of query plan with selected SQL predicates for physical optimization. We implemented Smart in PostgreSQL and evaluated it on four widely-used benchmarks, JOB, TPC-H, SSB, and Flight. Experimental results revealed that Smart performed up to three orders of magnitude faster than the state-of-art baselines.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Guo, Y., Li, G., Hu, R., & Wang, Y. (2025). In-database query optimization on SQL with ML predicates. VLDB Journal, 34(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00778-024-00888-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free