Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study

4Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Establishing a common language that allows univocal and objective communication in describing wounds and their healing is of utmost importance in defining the diagnostic hypothesis and proper wound management. To measure the level of agreement on the description of wounds, an international study was performed among experts of different professional backgrounds on several common terms used to describe ulcerative lesions. A panel of 27 wound care experts anonymously completed a multiple-choice questionnaire on 100 images of 50 ulcerative lesions. The participants were asked to describe each image using a set of pre-defined terms. An expert data analyst interpreted the questionnaires to map the level of agreement on the used terminology. Our findings show a very low level of agreement among experts in using the proposed terminology to describe the wound bed, the wound edge, and the surrounding skin conditions. Efforts should be planned to find a consensus on the correct use of terminology for wound description. To this aim, partnership, consensus, and agreement with educators in medicine and nursing are necessary.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Greco, A., Mastronicola, D., Pacini, F., Giacomelli, L., Papa, S., Fiorentini, C., … Magnoni, C. (2023). Researching the level of agreement among experts on terms used to describe wounds: An international study. International Wound Journal, 20(8), 2973–2980. https://doi.org/10.1111/iwj.14164

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free