Immunogenicity of an inactivated rabies vaccine for animals derived from the recombinant ERAGS strain

2Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Purpose: The aims of the present study were to evaluate the immunogenicity of an inactivated rabies vaccine based on the ERAGS strain. Materials and Methods: The ERAGS virus propagated in Vero cells was inactivated with 3 mM binary ethylenimine for 8 hours. Three types of inactivated rabies vaccines were prepared to determine the minimum vaccine virus titers. Four further types of inactivated rabies vaccines were prepared by blending inactivated ERAGS with four different adjuvants; each vaccine was injected into mice, guinea pigs, and dogs to identify the optimal adjuvant. The im-munogenicity of a Montanide (IMS) gel-adjuvanted vaccine was evaluated in cats, dogs, and cattle. Humoral immune responses were measured via a fluorescent antibody virus neutraliza-tion method and a blocking enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. Results: The minimum virus titer of the inactivated rabies vaccine was over 107.0 50% tis-sue culture infectious doses (TCID50 values)/mL. Of the four kinds of adjuvants, the IMS gel-adjuvanted vaccine induced the highest mean viral neutralizing antibody (VNA) titers of 6.24 and 2.36 IU/mL in guinea pigs and dogs, respectively, and was thus selected as the vaccine for the target animals. Cats, dogs, and cattle inoculated with the IMS gel-adjuvanted vaccine developed protective VNA titers ranging from 3.5 to 1.2 IU/mL at 4 weeks post-inoculation (WPI). Conclusion: Our data indicate that cats, dogs, and cattle inoculated with an inactivated rabies vaccine derived from the ERAGS strain developed protective immune responses that were maintained to 12 WPI.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, D. K., Kim, H. H., Park, Y. R., Yoo, J. Y., Park, Y., An, S., & Hyun, B. H. (2021). Immunogenicity of an inactivated rabies vaccine for animals derived from the recombinant ERAGS strain. Clinical and Experimental Vaccine Research, 10(2), 141–147. https://doi.org/10.7774/CEVR.2021.10.2.141

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free