Electronic Screening Improves Efficiency in Clinical Trial Recruitment

102Citations
Citations of this article
96Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

This study evaluated the performance of an electronic screening (E-screening) method and used it to recruit patients for the NIH sponsored ACCORD trial. Out of the 193 E-screened patients, 125 met the age criterion ("age ≥ 40"). For all of these 125 patients, the performance of E-screening was compared with investigator review. E-screening achieved a negative predictive accuracy of 100% (95% CI: 98-100%), a positive predictive accuracy of 13% (95% CI: 6-13%), a sensitivity of 100% (95% CI: 45-100%), and a specificity of 84% (95% CI: 82-84%). The method maximized the use of a patient database query (i.e., excluded ineligible patients with a 100% accuracy and automatically assembled patient information to facilitate manual review of only patients who were classified as "potentially eligible" by E-screening) and significantly reduced the screening burden associated with the ACCORD trial. © 2009 J Am Med Inform Assoc.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Thadani, S. R., Weng, C., Bigger, J. T., Ennever, J. F., & Wajngurt, D. (2009). Electronic Screening Improves Efficiency in Clinical Trial Recruitment. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 16(6), 869–873. https://doi.org/10.1197/jamia.M3119

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free