Fracture Risk Assessment and How to Implement a Fracture Liaison Service

10Citations
Citations of this article
19Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The human, healthcare and financial costs of fragility fracture are considerable and at present there is an apparent need to address the growing gap between those who require treatment and those who actually receive it. Fracture Liaison Services (FLS) have been established to address this gap through the identification, treatment and monitoring of those sustaining fragility fractures with the aim of preventing secondary fractures. In this chapter, we present data from studies which support the instigation of FLS as clinically- and cost-effective initiatives. We provide a step-by-step approach to implementation and benchmarking and provide advice regarding the development of an FLS in a low-resource setting.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Fuggle, N. R., Kassim Javaid, M., Fujita, M., Halbout, P., Dawson-Hughes, B., Rizzoli, R., … Cooper, C. (2021). Fracture Risk Assessment and How to Implement a Fracture Liaison Service. In Practical Issues in Geriatrics (pp. 241–256). Springer Nature. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-48126-1_14

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free