Abstract
The COVID-19 pandemic has significantly impacted people's daily lives for over three years. Airports, with their dense population and frequent close contact, pose a higher risk of respiratory infectious diseases compared to many other indoor environments. However, limited availability of data on close contact behavior has resulted in a gap in indoor exposure analysis. This study conducted depth sensor measurements and video data collection across nine areas of a northern (airport A) and a southern (airport B) airports in China by 11 participants. The data, comprising more than 44 h of close contact behaviors, including interpersonal distance, relative facial orientation, and the relative position of individuals, were analyzed using a semi-supervised machine learning method. Based on this analysis, a close contact transmission model for COVID-19 was developed, which considers the aforementioned close contact behaviors to assess the risk of exposure and the efficacy of interventions. The average close contact ratio in 9 airport's areas is 25.4 % (ranging from 6.1 % to 55.0 %), with passengers having the highest frequency of close contact in manual check-in areas. During close contacts, the average interpersonal distance in airports is 1.2 m (ranging from 1.1 to 1.4 m), being shortest in boarding areas. Face-to-face close contact is highest in charging areas, with a percentage of 46.9 %. If people maintain a distance of over 1.0 m in all areas, the total virus exposure could be reduced by 6.9 %–22.0 % compared to the actual situation. Dining areas have the highest virus exposure risk for both short-range inhalation and mucosal deposition, followed by manual check-in areas. This study provides a data support for the scientific epidemic prevention and control in airports from the viewpoint of close contact behaviors.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Yang, X., Dou, Z., Ding, Y., Su, B., Qian, H., & Zhang, N. (2024). Analysis of SARS-CoV-2 transmission in airports based on real human close contact behaviors. Journal of Building Engineering, 82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobe.2023.108299
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.