Seeking alternatives in therapeutic recreation/recreation therapy: a social/recreation community model

23Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Controversy concerning the medical model within the therapeutic recreation (TR) community has a long history. Authors have contested the legitimacy of the medical model in TR, arguing that a social model is more suitable. In keeping with the recent call to continue conversations about re-imagining TR, the purpose of this article was to identify and describe a theoretical framework for changing the environment through recreation relationships instead of rehabilitating the person. The construction of TR’s history cannot be understood solely based on the medical model. Another history arose from a heritage social concern, later correlating with the disability rights movement. We further explored the theoretical and research evidence for a ‘contra-therapy’ understanding of TR. Belongingness was identified as a concept that articulated well with the alternative view of TR based largely on the social model. Lastly, the implications of adopting a social/recreation community model are reviewed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mobily, K. E., & Dieser, R. B. (2018). Seeking alternatives in therapeutic recreation/recreation therapy: a social/recreation community model. Leisure/ Loisir, 42(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/14927713.2017.1403860

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free