Financing Constraints and the Mode of Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions or Greenfield Investment

1Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this paper, two investment modes, greenfield investment and cross-border mergers and acquisitions, are introduced on the basis of Manova (2008), and it is found that enterprises with less financing constraints tend to choose cross-border mergers and acquisitions. Therefore, this paper takes Chinese industrial enterprises that conducted cross-border mergers and acquisitions and greenfield investment in 2003-2010 as examples to test the above hypothesis. The result shows that enterprises with lower financing constraints are more likely to choose cross-border mergers and acquisitions, while those with stronger constraints choose greenfield investment. More specifically, a 1% reduction in financing constraints raises the probability of choosing cross-border mergers and acquisitions by 2.51%. The authors also find that the influence of financing constraints varies under different investment motivation. For business service and production-related investment, enterprises with lower financing constraints tend to choose cross-border mergers and acquisitions; while for R&D investment, financing constraints have no impact on the choice of investment mode.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jiang, G., & Zeng, J. (2020). Financing Constraints and the Mode of Outward Foreign Direct Investment: Cross-Border Mergers and Acquisitions or Greenfield Investment. China Finance and Economic Review, 9(4), 46–66. https://doi.org/10.1515/cfer-2020-090403

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free