Abstract
This paper emphasizes a need to recognize sexual refusals both in public discourse and in the context of particular interactions. I draw on sociolinguistic work on the structure of refusals to illuminate a much-discussed case of alleged sexual violence as well as to inform how we ought to think and talk about sexual consent and refusal more generally. I argue on empirical and ideological grounds that we ought to impute the same significance to refusals uttered in sexual contexts as we do to those uttered in nonsexual contexts. Finally, I propose an amendment to the definition of affirmative consent that would put it in line with the conclusions drawn in the rest of the paper.
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Clausen, G. T. (2020). “Next Time” Means “No”: Sexual Consent and the Structure of Refusals. Feminist Philosophy Quarterly, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.5206/fpq/2020.4.8390
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.