Protein versus conventional crystals: Creation of defects

42Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Recent data on protein crystal growth are reviewed and analyzed with an emphasis to crystal perfection. Since relative supersaturation for protein crystal growth is typically much higher than unity, no considerable detachment of species is expected once joined to the crystal lattice at a kink. Selection of proper molecules and their precise orientation should occur mainly at the stage when they try to join kinks. Sectorial and zonal (striation) structures induced by impurities and other point defects may cause mosaicity even without creation of misfit dislocations. Critical crystal size is estimated at which the dislocation network may be thermodynamically favorable. Since the crystals have isometric shape, this critical size turns out to be about an order of magnitude higher than the critical thickness of a pseudomorphic epitaxial layer. X-ray diffraction rocking curves width of about 0.02° for reflections equivalent to a misfit ∼ 3 x 10-4 should correspond to the critical crystal of ca 0.5 mm. As in epitaxy, if nucleation and spread of dislocations are hindered, the critical size may be essentially bigger or the crystal should crack. At high impurity concentrations, new misoriented blocks may appear by surface nucleation, similar to what should happen in inorganic crystals growing from solutions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Chernov, A. A. (1997). Protein versus conventional crystals: Creation of defects. Journal of Crystal Growth, 174(1–4), 354–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0022-0248(96)01129-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free