Skip to content

Contested externalisation: responses to global inequalities

2Citations
Citations of this article
8Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This artice is free to access.

Abstract

What is new about contemporary remote control across borders? An important element is the reference to human rights norms by various political actors such as NGOs, migrant associations but also national governments, international organisations and an activist judiciary. It is evident that externalisation policies mirror stark power asymmetries of the global and regional political orders, and thus reflect social inequalities more generally. The contestation around externalized migration control has gone through several periods. Integral to an understanding of control are the practices of migrants themselves, how they seek to circumvent controls or even resist. Thinking further ahead, we may conceive of the border as a paradox, involving both connecting and separating humans and artefacts. Such an understanding of border allows for the possibility of coexistence; difference between two or more entities being a requirement. The border does not belong to either side. How to imagine such a type of border between states is a formidable challenge to social theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Faist, T. (2019, December 1). Contested externalisation: responses to global inequalities. Comparative Migration Studies. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40878-019-0158-y

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free