Greece: A procedural defence of democracy against the Golden Dawn

14Citations
Citations of this article
10Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Greece not a militant democracy - Constitution rejects party bans - Challenge posed by neo-Nazi party Golden Dawn - Preference for a procedural approach - Not as passive as previously thought - Proactive use of regular law - Golden Dawn charged for being a criminal organisation disguised as a political party - Questions about the political timing of the trial - Importance of judiciary independence - Why not a terrorist organization - Suspension of party funding and other restrictions against Golden Dawn - Actions by state institutions as opposed to local and civil society - How to distinguish between procedural- and militant-democratic initiatives - Political rights of convicted party leaders - Benefits and risks of procedural model.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Malkopoulou, A. (2021, June 1). Greece: A procedural defence of democracy against the Golden Dawn. European Constitutional Law Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019621000146

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free