Non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction with “N” wave on electrocardiogram and culprit vessel in left circumflex has a risk equivalent to ST-elevated myocardial infarction

7Citations
Citations of this article
17Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Background: It was found that delayed activation wave often appeared in terminal QRS wave in non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (NSTEMI) with culprit vessel in left circumflex artery (LCX), yet little is known about the similarities among non-“N”-wave non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction (N-NSTEMI) and ST-elevated myocardial infarction (STEMI). Hypothesis: In AMI patients with the culprit vessel in LCX, “N” wave NSTEMI has a risk equivalent to STEMI. Methods: All 874 patients admitted to Shenjing Hospital of China Medical University between January 1, 2013 and December 30, 2017 were included and whose coronary angiography (CAG) indicated the culprit vessel in LCX. Patients were divided into three groups: ST-elevated myocardial infarction group (STEMI group, n = 322), “N” wave non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction group (N-NSTEMI group, n = 232) and non-“N”-wave NSTEMI group (non N-NSTEMI group, n = 320). The basic data and the incidence of MACE during hospitalization and 12 months were analyzed. Results: In STEMI and N-NSTEMI groups, AST, CK, CK-MB, TnI, and stenosis severity were significantly higher than non N-NSTEMI (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Yang, T., Chen, J., Liu, X., Xu, C., Niu, T., Fu, X., & Fu, P. (2020). Non-ST-elevated myocardial infarction with “N” wave on electrocardiogram and culprit vessel in left circumflex has a risk equivalent to ST-elevated myocardial infarction. Clinical Cardiology, 43(5), 491–499. https://doi.org/10.1002/clc.23334

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free