Co-creation to measure what matters: The case of Venserpolder, Amsterdam

2Citations
Citations of this article
18Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

In light of widening urban inequalities, the use of top-down policy approaches and narrowly defined economic indicators is criticized for overlooking broader and divergent well-being needs, in objective and subjective terms. Despite growing calls for a human-centered and multidimensional approach to urban policy, there is a dearth in empirical research addressing required instruments. This paper presents a pilot study in which citizens identify broader well-being indicators and co-create a local policy instrument (Wellbeing Dashboard) in Venserpolder, a marginalized Amsterdam neighborhood. A transferable bottom-up method is derived, entailing co-creation, face-to-face surveys and experimental dialogs, that supports citizen empowerment. Findings indicate how the process empowers citizens through social learning and capacity building. Moreover, the Wellbeing Dashboard provides credible data on well-being needs and priorities, otherwise ill-captured in formal economic indicators, and facilitates citizen empowerment once embedded in policy practice.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

van Beek, J. E. M., Pouw, N. R. M., & Verrest, H. J. L. M. (2026). Co-creation to measure what matters: The case of Venserpolder, Amsterdam. Journal of Urban Affairs, 48(5), 1544–1563. https://doi.org/10.1080/07352166.2025.2480806

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free