Zum Gap zwischen theoriebasierter Planungsforschung und Planungspraxis. Eine Betrachtung weiter Teile des deutschsprachigen planungswissenschaftlichen Outputs seit 2003

  • Diller C
  • Thaler T
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
5Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

In this article a major part of the German-language output in spatial sciences between 2003 and 2014 is examined towards a supposed gap between theory-based research and planning practice. Thus a total of 1929 articles contained in scientific series of the Akademie für Raumforschung und Landesplanung (ARL) and three journals is analysed to different degrees of detailing. In the first step, a classification was conducted in order to organise the empirical results. In a second step, detailed analyses were followed. The assumption of a gap all in all is confirmed: Only a small part of the examined articles argues visible theory-based. And within these articles the empirical examination of theories mostly is succeeding only rudimentary and the practical benefit of the research results is rarely noticeable. This finding as well shows, that the requirement of transdisciplinarity in the planning sciences can only partly be fulfilled. This could be the result from reasons in between the system of research as well as in conceptual deficits in the planning research itself.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Diller, C., & Thaler, T. (2017). Zum Gap zwischen theoriebasierter Planungsforschung und Planungspraxis. Eine Betrachtung weiter Teile des deutschsprachigen planungswissenschaftlichen Outputs seit 2003. Raumforschung Und Raumordnung | Spatial Research and Planning, 75(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13147-016-0431-6

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free