A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties

600Citations
Citations of this article
838Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The mechanical properties of cells influence their cellular and subcellular functions, including cell adhesion, migration, polarization, and differentiation, as well as organelle organization and trafficking inside the cytoplasm. Yet reported values of cell stiffness and viscosity vary substantially, which suggests differences in how the results of different methods are obtained or analyzed by different groups. To address this issue and illustrate the complementarity of certain approaches, here we present, analyze, and critically compare measurements obtained by means of some of the most widely used methods for cell mechanics: atomic force microscopy, magnetic twisting cytometry, particle-tracking microrheology, parallel-plate rheom-etry, cell monolayer rheology, and optical stretching. These measurements highlight how elastic and viscous moduli of MCF-7 breast cancer cells can vary 1,000-fold and 100-fold, respectively. We discuss the sources of these variations, including the level of applied mechanical stress, the rate of deformation, the geometry of the probe, the location probed in the cell, and the extracellular microenvironment.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Wu, P. H., Aroush, D. R. B., Asnacios, A., Chen, W. C., Dokukin, M. E., Doss, B. L., … Wirtz, D. (2018). A comparison of methods to assess cell mechanical properties. Nature Methods, 15(7), 491–498. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-018-0015-1

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free