A cohort study of the temporal stability of ImPACT Scores among NCAA Division i collegiate athletes: Clinical implications of test-retest reliability for enhancing student athlete safety

5Citations
Citations of this article
34Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Objective: In this study we examined the temporal stability of the Immediate Post-Concussion Assessment and Cognitive Test (ImPACT) within NCAA Division I athletes across various timepoints using an exhaustive series of statistical models. Methods:Within a cohort design, 48 athletes completed repeated baseline ImPACT assessments at various timepoints. Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC) were calculated using a two-way mixed effects model with absolute agreement. Results: Four ImPACT composite scores (Verbal Memory, Visual Memory, Visual Motor Speed, and Reaction Time) demonstrated moderate reliability (ICC = 0.51-0.66) across the span of a typical Division I athlete's career, which is below previous reliability recommendations (0.90) for measures used in individual decision-making. No evidence of fixed bias was detected within Verbal Memory, VisualMotor Speed, or Reaction Time composite scores, and minimal detectable change values exceeded the limits of agreement. Conclusions: The demonstrated temporal stability of the ImPACT falls below the published recommendations, and as such, fails to provide robust support for the NCAA's recommendation to obtain a single preparticipation cognitive baseline for use in sportsrelated concussion management throughout an athlete's career. Clinical interpretation guidelines are provided for clinicians who utilize baseline ImPACT scores for later performance comparisons.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Mason, S. J., Davidson, B. S., Lehto, M., Ledreux, A., Granholm, A. C., & Gorgens, K. A. (2021). A cohort study of the temporal stability of ImPACT Scores among NCAA Division i collegiate athletes: Clinical implications of test-retest reliability for enhancing student athlete safety. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 35(7), 1131–1144. https://doi.org/10.1093/ARCLIN/ACAA047

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free