Gaining balance: Toward a grounded theory of the decision-making processes of applicants for adoption of children with and without disabilities

10Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

A grounded theory is presented of the decision-making processes among applicants when considering available children with and without disabilities for domestic public adoption. Using grounded theory methodology (Strauss & Corbin, 1998), data from 15 adoption applicants were analyzed followed the traditional three coding phases. The central category of Adoption Decision Making is labeled Gaining Balance and was the underpinning concept to all categories and sub-categories (i.e., in parentheses) of the theory: Commitment (e.g., motivation, financial considerations), Persistence (e.g., coping with emotions, counteracting pessimism), and Evaluation (e.g., assessments of personal abilities and resources, assessments of knowledge of potential adoptees' needs). The results are compared to existing literature and implications for child welfare practices and further research are discussed.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Burge, P., & Jamieson, M. (2009). Gaining balance: Toward a grounded theory of the decision-making processes of applicants for adoption of children with and without disabilities. Qualitative Report, 14(4), 566–603. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2009.1370

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free