Using the Van Hiele theory to analyze primary school teachers' written work on geometrical proof problems

8Citations
Citations of this article
55Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

The lack of ability of primary school teachers in deductive thinking, such as doing geometrical proof, is an indispensable issue to be dealt with. In this paper, we report on results of a three-step of the field document study. The study was part of a pilot study for improving deductive thinking ability of primary school teachers. First, we designed geometrical proof problems adapted from literature. Second, we administered an individual written test involving nine master students of primary education program, in which they are having experiences as primary school mathematics teachers. Finally, we analyzed the written work from the view of the Van Hiele theory. The results revealed that even if about the half of the teachers show ability in doing formal proof, still the rest provides inappropriate proving. For further investigation, we wonder whether primary school teachers would show better deductive thinking if the teaching of geometry is designed in a systematic and appropriate manner according to the Van Hiele theory.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Jupri, A. (2018). Using the Van Hiele theory to analyze primary school teachers’ written work on geometrical proof problems. In Journal of Physics: Conference Series (Vol. 1013). Institute of Physics Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1013/1/012117

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free