Use of cavity ring-down spectrometry to quantify 13 C-primary productivity in oligotrophic waters

12Citations
Citations of this article
31Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Cavity ring-down spectroscopy (CRDS) is a highly sensitive laser technique that allows the analysis of isotopic signals and absolute concentration of individual molecular species in small-volume samples. Here, we describe a protocol to quantify photosynthetic 13 C-uptake rates of marine phytoplankton by using the CRDS technique ( 13 C-CRDS-PP). We validated our method by comparing the 13 C-PP rates measured between CRDS and isotope ratio mass spectrometry (IRMS) in samples with different carbon content (30–160 μgC). The comparison revealed that 13 C-CRDS-PP rates were highly correlated with those obtained by IRMS (Spearman correlation coefficient, ρ = 0.95, p < 0.0001, n = 15), with a mean difference between the two estimates of ± 0.08 mgC m −3 h −1 . Moreover, the slope of the relationship between CRDS and IRMS results was not significantly different from 1 (F = 0.03, p = 0.86), and the intercept did not differ from 0 (F = 1.4, p = 0.24), indicating that there was no bias in the CRDS relative to the IRMS-based measurements. A separate analysis also showed that despite the difference in volume and carbon content between samples (40 ± 10 μgC and 160 ± 40 μgC, respectively), the 13 C-CRDS-PP technique provides similar results (Mann–Whitney test, U = 30.5, p = 0.90, n = 8). In addition, 13 C-CRDS-PP rates measured along the Red Sea (∼ 176 mgC m −2 d −1 ) agreed with 14 C-based PP rates previously reported for similar locations. Thus, this study evidenced that the 13 C-CRDS-PP method is sensitive enough to quantify carbon fixation rates in oligotrophic regions.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

López-Sandoval, D. C., Delgado-Huertas, A., Carrillo-de-Albornoz, P., Duarte, C. M., & Agustí, S. (2019). Use of cavity ring-down spectrometry to quantify 13 C-primary productivity in oligotrophic waters. Limnology and Oceanography: Methods, 17(2), 137–144. https://doi.org/10.1002/lom3.10305

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free