The influence of platform switching in dental implants. A literature review

25Citations
Citations of this article
110Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Introduction: The platform switching concept involves the reduction of the restoration abutment diameter with respect to the diameter of the dental implant. In 1991, dental implants of 5 and 6 mm diameter platforms were introduced. However, matching-diameter prosthetic abutments were not available. These implants were restored with "standard"-diameter prosthetic components (4,1 mm). Long-term follow up around these wide-platforms showed higher levels of bone preservation. In time, it has been called platform switching. The first case report applying this concept was indexed in Med Line in 2005. Materials and Methods: The aim of this article is to carry out a literature review of articles which deal with the influence of this modified platform in hard and soft oral tissues. All papers involving " platform switching " that are indexed in Med Line and published in English were used. Clinical cases, experimental and non-experimental studies were included, as well as literature reviews. Results: In our search, we found: 16 clinical series or single clinical cases, 10 test and control studies, 9 experimental studies and 3 reviews. Conclusion: All papers written by different researchers show an improvement in per implant bone preservation. Further long-term studies are necessary to confirm these results. The articles consulted refer to the biomechanical behavior of the abutment-implant complex in response to occlusal loading, the maintenance of crystal bone height and the peculiar repositioning of the biological space. © Medicina Oral S. L. C.I.F.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Serrano-Sánchez, P., Calvo-Guirado, J. L., Manzanera-Pastor, E., Lorrio-Castro, C., Bretones-López, P., & Pérez-Llanes, J. A. (2011). The influence of platform switching in dental implants. A literature review. Medicina Oral, Patologia Oral y Cirugia Bucal, 16(3), 400–405. https://doi.org/10.4317/medoral.16.e400

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free