Abstract
Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin + daunorubicin-cytarabine (GO + DA) versus common induction therapies for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Materials & methods: A network meta-analysis following a systematic literature review. Results: In base-case analyses, GO + DA was associated with significantly greater overall survival and relapse-free survival versus most comparators, and similar rates of complete remission versus all evaluated comparators. Similar findings were seen in the subgroup analyses. Grade 3+ bleeding and hepatic events were higher with GO + DA versus some comparators, consistent with GO's profile. No differences were found for other evaluated outcomes. Conclusion: GO + DA provides significant overall survival and relapse-free survival benefit versus evaluated induction regimens for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ashaye, A. O., Khankhel, Z., Xu, Y., Fahrbach, K., Mokgokong, R., Orme, M. E., … Mamolo, C. (2019, February 1). A comparative evaluation of gemtuzumab ozogamicin + daunorubicin-cytarabine and other treatments for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncology. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0512
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.