A comparative evaluation of gemtuzumab ozogamicin + daunorubicin-cytarabine and other treatments for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia

5Citations
Citations of this article
27Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

Aim: To evaluate the comparative efficacy and safety of gemtuzumab ozogamicin + daunorubicin-cytarabine (GO + DA) versus common induction therapies for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Materials & methods: A network meta-analysis following a systematic literature review. Results: In base-case analyses, GO + DA was associated with significantly greater overall survival and relapse-free survival versus most comparators, and similar rates of complete remission versus all evaluated comparators. Similar findings were seen in the subgroup analyses. Grade 3+ bleeding and hepatic events were higher with GO + DA versus some comparators, consistent with GO's profile. No differences were found for other evaluated outcomes. Conclusion: GO + DA provides significant overall survival and relapse-free survival benefit versus evaluated induction regimens for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Ashaye, A. O., Khankhel, Z., Xu, Y., Fahrbach, K., Mokgokong, R., Orme, M. E., … Mamolo, C. (2019, February 1). A comparative evaluation of gemtuzumab ozogamicin + daunorubicin-cytarabine and other treatments for newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia. Future Oncology. Future Medicine Ltd. https://doi.org/10.2217/fon-2018-0512

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free