Reproducibility in Science: A Metrology Perspective

  • Plant A
  • Hanisch R
N/ACitations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Scientific progress requires the ability of scientists to build on the results produced by those who preceded them. Because of this, there is concern that irreproducible scientific results are being reported. We suggest that while reproducibility can be an important hallmark of good science, it is not often the most important indicator. The discipline of metrology, or measurement science, describes a measurement result as a value and the uncertainty around that value. We propose a systematic process for considering the sources of uncertainty in a scientific study that can be applied to virtually all disciplines of scientific research.  We suggest that a research study can be characterized by how sources of uncertainty in the study are reported and mitigated.  Such activities can add to the value of scientific results and the ability to share data effectively.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Plant, A. L., & Hanisch, R. J. (2020). Reproducibility in Science: A Metrology Perspective. Harvard Data Science Review, 2(4). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.eb6ddee4

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free