Knightian Uncertainty in Entrepreneurship Research: Retrospect and Prospect

1Citations
Citations of this article
40Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

This article is free to access.

Abstract

While Knightian uncertainty (KU) has been central to entrepreneurship research for over half a century, there remains a lack of consensus on how to define, apply, and learn from the concept. We argue that, despite the apparent fragmentation of views and theories, there has been significant and valuable knowledge accumulation around KU that can inform entrepreneurship research. Reviewing 238 articles published over the past 60 years across seven disciplines, we find that (1) there is considerable congruity in how KU is discussed within, but not across, disciplines and at micro, meso, and macro levels of analysis; (2) cross-fertilization and integration of interdisciplinary insights exist but are insufficiently explored by entrepreneurship researchers; (3) progress in understanding and analyzing uncertainty may come primarily from multi-level, interdisciplinary analysis; and (4) entrepreneurship researchers may benefit from engaging the definitions and theories of uncertainty from neighboring fields like economics and decision science. We suggest a variety of research questions to unite different disciplines across levels of analysis to create a more integrated research agenda for KU in entrepreneurship studies.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Dorobat, C. E., McCaffrey, M., Foss, N. J., & Klein, P. G. (2025). Knightian Uncertainty in Entrepreneurship Research: Retrospect and Prospect. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 49(5), 1392–1430. https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587251347062

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free