Should deferred stenting still be considered in st-elevation myocardial infarction with high thrombus burden?

2Citations
Citations of this article
12Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) may demonstrate distal microvascular embolization of thrombotic materials. We retrospectively examined 20 cases displaying extensive thrombus in the infarct-related artery (IRA), treated either with a two-step procedure, with interim tirofiban infusion, or immediate stent implantation. Distal embolization tended to be more common in the latter strategy, but, overall, the outcome was comparable. Thus, a two-staged procedure may be considered in selected cases of primary PCI associated with high thrombus burden.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Sakellariou, X. M., Katsanos, G. I., Efstathopoulos, A. P., Sfairopoulos, D. G., Stamatis, K. V., Pappas, S. D., … Nikas, D. N. (2021). Should deferred stenting still be considered in st-elevation myocardial infarction with high thrombus burden? Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease, 8(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/jcdd8060059

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free