The independent effect of propofol anesthesia on whole body protein metabolism in humans

25Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of general anesthesia with propofol in the absence of surgical stimulation on whole body protein metabolism. Methods: Six unpremedicated patients were studied. General anesthesia included propofol (120 μg · kg-1 · min-1), vecuronium bromide, and oxygen-enriched air. Changes in protein breakdown, protein oxidation, and synthesis were measured by an isotope dilution technique using a constant infusion of the stable isotope tracer L- [1-13C]leucine (0.008 mg · kg-1 · min-1) before and during 100 min of propofol anesthesia. The plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, non- esterified fatty acids, and cortisol were measured before and during anesthesia. Results: An isotopic steady state of plasma [1-13C]α- ketoisocaproate (taken to represent the intracellular leucine precursor pool enrichment for protein synthesis) and expired 13C-carbon dioxide were obtained before and during propofol infusion. Whole body protein breakdown decreased during propofol anesthesia by 6% (P < 0.05), whereas protein synthesis and oxidation did not change significantly. Plasma concentration of cortisol decreased after 90 min of propofol anesthesia (P < 0.05). No significant changes of plasma concentrations of glucose, lactate, and non- esterified fatty acids occurred during propofol administration. Conclusions: Propofol anesthesia did not significantly affect whole body protein synthesis and oxidation but caused a small, although significant, decrease in whole body protein breakdown, possibly mediated through the suppression of plasma cortisol concentration.

Author supplied keywords

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Schricker, T., Klubien, K., & Carli, F. (1999). The independent effect of propofol anesthesia on whole body protein metabolism in humans. Anesthesiology, 90(6), 1636–1642. https://doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199906000-00020

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free