Abstract
We compare five monocular depth estimation methods based on deep learning. This comparison focuses on how well methods generalize rather than a quantitative comparison on a specific dataset. This study shows that while monocular depth estimation methods work well on images similar to training images, they often show artifacts when applied on images out of the training distribution. We evaluate the different methods with images similar to training data and images with unusual point of views (e.g. top-down) or paintings. The readers are invited to judge by themselves about the advantages and drawbacks of all methods by submitting their own images to the online demo associated with the present paper.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Ehret, T. (2023). Monocular Depth Estimation: a Review of the 2022 State of the Art. Image Processing On Line, 13, 38–56. https://doi.org/10.5201/ipol.2023.459
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.