Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action

0Citations
Citations of this article
7Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

The Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs) are key documents providing the starting point for increasingly ambitious ‘pledge-and-review’ cycles leading to the implementation of the Paris Agreement. However, current NDCs often lack consistent and transparent targets and indicators to ensure their in-country realisation and their monitoring, tracking, and reporting in compliance with the current climate change regime. This is particularly true for developing countries, where resources and capacity to define and implement climate action plans are still largely lacking among practitioners. To tackle this problem, this essay proposes a framework for NDCs development focusing on the practitioners’ – i.e., modellers and expert analysts – uptake of open science practices, particularly concerning open-source tools and open data, via capacity-building initiatives as a first step towards transparent and accountable NDCs delivery and implementation to the benefit of national and international climate governance. The framework is applied to the case study of Costa Rica, to test its relevance and applicability.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Beltramo, A., Henrysson, M., & Usher, W. (2026). Open science practices for better NDCs: Supporting transparent and accountable climate mitigation action. PLOS Climate, 5(2 February). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pclm.0000839

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free