Abstract
Compared to political developments in Eastern Europe and Latin America, democratization in sub-Saharan Africa has been more problematic and uneven. Looking at the performance in four subregions - central Africa, East Africa, southern Africa, and West Africa - yields no convincing evidence of a wave of democratization; countries next to each other differ considerably with regard to their Freedom House scores. This does not mean that democratization has necessarily stalled, but it does demonstrate that the prevailing vertical cleavages along ethnic, racial, or religious lines can make such a transition volatile, as suggested by the cases of Burundi, Mali, and even Kenya. While political competition in mature democracies, typically divided along horizontal group or class lines, tends to generate positive-sum outcomes, such competition in Africa easily turns into prisoner's dilemma games. The uncertainty about the value of cooperation in such situations usually produces political truces that are easily abandoned if the costs of adherence exceed the benefits. Against the background of this prevailing political logic, this article calls for a new approach to conceptualizing notions of institution and power in the analysis of politics in the region.
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hyden, G. (2016, December 1). Beyond the Liberal Democracy Paradigm: A Fresh Look at Power and Institutions. African Studies Review. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/asr.2016.121
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.