Paramalleolar arterial bollinger score in the era of diabetes and end-stage renal disease - Usefulness for predicting operative outcome of critical limb ischemia

6Citations
Citations of this article
37Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to evaluate the usefulness of paramalleolar arterial Bollinger score (PBS) for predicting postoperative outcome of infra-popliteal bypass surgery for critical limb ischemia (CLI). Methods and Results: A total of 104 consecutive patients (118 limbs) who underwent infra-popliteal (tibial or paramalleolar) arterial bypass surgery with an autologous vein conduit for the treatment of CLI (Rutherford 4–6) between January 2002 and December 2012 were classified according to PBS ≤45 or >45. Postoperative outcome was compared between these groups. Primary outcomes were major adverse limb events plus perioperative death, and amputation-free survival (AFS). The secondary outcomes were overall survival, limb salvage and secondary graft patency. More than 80% of patients had either diabetes mellitus (DM) or end-stage renal disease (ESRD) and 30 patients with 36 limbs had PBS >45. Compared with the PBS ≤45 group, the PBS >45 group had higher CVD and carotid stenosis rate, poor nutrition status and lower malignancy rate. On overall analysis, the PBS >45 group had worse outcome for AFS and survival but this was not statistically significant (P=0.12, NS). In DM or ESRD patients, the PBS >45 group had significantly worse outcome for both AFS (P=0.04, 0.02) and overall survival rate (P=0.04, 0.03). Conclusions: PBS successfully classified CLI patients with DM or ESRD who had worse outcome after infra-popliteal bypass surgery.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Matsukura, M., Hoshina, K., Shigematsu, K., Miyata, T., & Watanabe, T. (2015). Paramalleolar arterial bollinger score in the era of diabetes and end-stage renal disease - Usefulness for predicting operative outcome of critical limb ischemia. Circulation Journal, 80(1), 235–242. https://doi.org/10.1253/circj.CJ-15-0704

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free