Effect of the Slide-to-Roll Ratio and the Contact Kinematics on the Elastohydrodynamic Friction in Diamond-Like-Carbon Contacts with Different Wetting Behaviours

27Citations
Citations of this article
22Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

In this paper, we show how the slide-to-roll ratio (SRR), the contact kinematics and the surface energy all have important effects on the elastohydrodynamic friction. As reported previously, diamond-like-carbon (DLC) contacts of the type DLC/DLC provide the lowest coefficient of friction, in particular those DLC materials with the lowest surface energies (three different DLC coatings were used in this study). A friction reduction of up to 48 %, compared to a steel/steel contact, was obtained. A surprising new finding from this investigation is that the friction in DLC contacts is significantly reduced for high SRRs, i.e. a difference of up to 27 % was measured in the DLC/DLC contacts when the SRR increased from 0.5 (rolling prevails) to 1.8 (sliding prevails). However, even more surprising is the effect of the SRR on the friction in mixed steel/DLC contacts, which is related to the contact design and its kinematics. We found that if the DLC is coated on the slower surface, a high SRR will not reduce the friction to any significant extent, typically about 5 %, and at most 13 %, compared to steel/steel contacts. However, a significant friction reduction is observed when applying a low-surface-energy DLC coating to the faster surface - on average about 20 % and as high as 33 %. In this case (a high SRR and DLC on the faster surface), mixed steel/DLC surfaces can experience a very similar friction as that seen for DLC/DLC contacts. Qualitatively, the same behaviour was found for both positive and negative SRR values.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Polajnar, M., & Kalin, M. (2015). Effect of the Slide-to-Roll Ratio and the Contact Kinematics on the Elastohydrodynamic Friction in Diamond-Like-Carbon Contacts with Different Wetting Behaviours. Tribology Letters, 60(1). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11249-015-0593-3

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free