Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry

6Citations
Citations of this article
20Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Background: The introduction of quadripolar (QP) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) leads aimed to improve procedural and clinical outcomes. Objective: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry was analyzed to characterize the use as well as the procedural and clinical outcomes of QP leads in comparison with unipolar and bipolar (BP) leads. Methods: We evaluated data on 175,684 procedures reported between September 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims data. Results: Among all CRT device implants, there was a drop in reported lead placement failure from 6.04% to 5.21% (P

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Hakemi, E. U., Doukky, R., Parzynski, C. S., Curtis, J. P., & Madias, C. (2020). Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Heart Rhythm, 17(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.028

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free