Abstract
Background: The introduction of quadripolar (QP) cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) leads aimed to improve procedural and clinical outcomes. Objective: The National Cardiovascular Data Registry was analyzed to characterize the use as well as the procedural and clinical outcomes of QP leads in comparison with unipolar and bipolar (BP) leads. Methods: We evaluated data on 175,684 procedures reported between September 1, 2010, and December 31, 2015. Clinical outcomes were analyzed using Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services claims data. Results: Among all CRT device implants, there was a drop in reported lead placement failure from 6.04% to 5.21% (P
Author supplied keywords
Cite
CITATION STYLE
Hakemi, E. U., Doukky, R., Parzynski, C. S., Curtis, J. P., & Madias, C. (2020). Quadripolar versus bipolar leads in cardiac resynchronization therapy: An analysis of the National Cardiovascular Data Registry. Heart Rhythm, 17(1), 81–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrthm.2019.07.028
Register to see more suggestions
Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.