Driving Reality vs. Simulator: Data Distinctions

3Citations
Citations of this article
6Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

As the automotive industry undergoes a phase of rapid transformation driven by technological advancements, the integration of driving simulators stands out as an important tool for research and development. The usage of such simulators offers a controlled environment for studying driver behavior; the alignment of data, however, remains a complex aspect that warrants a thorough investigation. This research investigates driver state classification using a dataset obtained from real-road and simulated conditions, recorded through JINS MEME ES_R smart glasses. The dataset encompasses electrooculography signals, with a focus on standardizing and processing the data for subsequent analysis. For this purpose, we used a recurrent neural network model, which yielded a high accuracy on the testing dataset (86.5%). The findings of this study indicate that the proposed methodology could be used in real scenarios and that it could be used for the development of intelligent transportation systems and driver monitoring technology.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Piaseczna, N., Doniec, R., Sieciński, S., Barańska, K., Jędrychowski, M., & Grzegorzek, M. (2024). Driving Reality vs. Simulator: Data Distinctions. Electronics (Switzerland), 13(14). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics13142708

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free