Regional versus General Anesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management after Distal Radius Fracture Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

5Citations
Citations of this article
57Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Distal radius fractures are the most prevalent upper extremity fractures, posing a significant public health concern. Recent studies comparing regional and general anesthesia for postoperative pain management after these fractures have yielded conflicting results. This meta-analysis aimed to compare the effectiveness of regional and general anesthesia concerning postoperative pain management and opioid consumption following distal radius fracture surgery. A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, Cochrane Library, and EMBASE databases to identify relevant randomized controlled trials. Four randomized trials involving 248 participants were included in the analysis. A pooled analysis revealed that regional anesthesia led to significantly reduced postoperative pain scores at 2 h compared to general anesthesia (SMD −2.03; 95% CI −2.88–−1.17). However, no significant differences in pain scores were observed between the two anesthesia types after 12 h post-surgery. Regional anesthesia was associated with lower total opioid consumption (SMD −0.76; 95% CI −1.25–−0.26) and fewer occurrences of nausea and vomiting compared to the general anesthesia. Nonetheless, opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge was significantly higher in the regional anesthesia group (SMD 0.83; 95% CI 0.47–1.20). The analgesic superiority of regional anesthesia is confined to the early postoperative hours with overall lower opioid use but a notable increase in opioid consumption on the first day post-discharge, potentially attributable to rebound pain.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Roh, Y. H., Park, S. G., & Lee, S. H. (2023). Regional versus General Anesthesia in Postoperative Pain Management after Distal Radius Fracture Surgery: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. Journal of Personalized Medicine, 13(11). https://doi.org/10.3390/jpm13111543

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free