Comparison of 180-degree and 360-degree skeletal muscle nerve cuff electrodes

5Citations
Citations of this article
4Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.
Get full text

Abstract

Use of skeletal muscle for cardiac augmentation is a promising technique for treatment of end-stage cardiac failure. An electrode woven through the latissimus dorsi that recruits nearby nerve fibers is commonly used to pace skeletal muscles both in clinical practice and in the laboratory. A proximally placed nerve cuff electrode offers potential advantages in improved recruitment of muscle fibers and low threshold for stimulation. We tested the effectiveness of a nerve cuff electrode passed directly about the proximal thoracodorsal nerve. Our report looks at the efficacy of nerve cuff electrode stimulation and compares electrical and histologic characteristics of a 180-degree wrap of the thoracodorsal nerve to a 360-degree wrap in dogs over 3 months. Threshold voltage at the commonly used pulse width of 200 microseconds was typically in the range of 400 to 600 mV for each electrode after 3 months. Statistical analysis revealed no significant difference (p < 0.05) in threshold voltage or current between the 180-degree and 360-degree nerve cuff electrode either at acute evaluation or after 3 months. Even contraction of latissimus dorsi was achieved with all implants. Adenosine triphosphatase Staining revealed 100% conversion of type II to type I fibers in all stimulated muscles. Histologic examination of the thoracodorsal nerve and latissimus dorsi muscle revealed no abnormalities grossly or by light microscopy. Thus, a carefully applied nerve cuff electrode is an atraumatic, effective method for skeletal muscle stimulation. The 180-degree and 360-degree nerve cuff configurations are equally effective. © 1992.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Letsou, G. V., Hogan, J. F., Lee, P., Kim, J. H., Ariyan, S., Dewar, M. L., … Elefteriades, J. A. (1992). Comparison of 180-degree and 360-degree skeletal muscle nerve cuff electrodes. The Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 54(5), 925–931. https://doi.org/10.1016/0003-4975(92)90651-J

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free