The comparison of anthracyclinebased and non-anthracycline-based regimens in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancers

3Citations
Citations of this article
11Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Abstract

Aim of the study: This study aimed to assess the efficacy of anthracycline- based (AB) and non-anthracycline- based (nAB) adjuvant therapies in the human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive non-metastatic BC (nMBC) patients. Material and methods: This retrospective study included women with HER2-positive BCs (stage I-III) treated with trastuzumab from 2008 to 2017. The patients were divided into two groups, including 196 patients in group AB and 67 in group nAB. Results: Cox's proportional hazard regression analysis showed no unfavourable predictors for five-year overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) except for stage and hormone therapy. The OS rate was 67.9% in group AB and 80.6% in group nAB (p = 0.630). The DFS rate was 61.6% in group AB compared with 67.1% in group nAB (p = 0.447). Conclusions: The results showed no difference between the efficacies of AB and nAB regimens in HER2-positive nMBCs in adjuvant setting. Therefore, selecting the nAB regimen can reduce the serious damage caused by the AB regimen.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Najafi, S., Sadeghi, M., Shajari, M. R., Abasvandi, F., & Mohebi, K. (2018). The comparison of anthracyclinebased and non-anthracycline-based regimens in adjuvant chemotherapy of HER2-positive non-metastatic breast cancers. Wspolczesna Onkologia, 22(2), 108–112. https://doi.org/10.5114/wo.2018.77048

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free