Chapter 3: Peace Process and Transitional Justice: The Comparative Study of Mindanao, Colombia, and Thailand’s Deep South

2Citations
Citations of this article
26Readers
Mendeley users who have this article in their library.

Your institution provides access to this article.

Abstract

The objective of this study is to understand the linkage between peace processes and transitional justice in armed conflict areas, comparing three experiences from Mindanao (the Philippines), Colombia, and Thailand’s Deep South in the implementation of transitional justice (TJ). The study found that the substantial success of conflict transformation in the Mindanao and Colombia peace processes resulted from balancing and emphasizing human rights and peace processes by applying significant transitional justice innovations at the implementation stage. Although the peace processes in Mindanao and Colombia evolved prior to 1996 and 1990, respectively, the peace process in Thailand’s Deep South commenced more recently, in 2013. Despite the time differences, this study helps us understand the relevance and importance of peace processes and transitional justice from each country, providing lessons for the progress of the peace process in Thailand’s Deep South.

Cite

CITATION STYLE

APA

Panjor, F., & Heemmina, A. (2018). Chapter 3: Peace Process and Transitional Justice: The Comparative Study of Mindanao, Colombia, and Thailand’s Deep South. Asian Affairs(UK), 45(2), 78–97. https://doi.org/10.1080/00927678.2019.1584279

Register to see more suggestions

Mendeley helps you to discover research relevant for your work.

Already have an account?

Save time finding and organizing research with Mendeley

Sign up for free